Note, what I'm actually after is the expected win percentage in this scenario. So for #2 above maybe we should just assume the system will use the same all-in hands regardless of first to act or not. Since we're talking about heads up, I think it would be better to omit the part of the system that says what to do if the opponent raises. In light of this, I think we would have to revise the system a bit, or else you could simply make a small raise every hand you act first (yielding nearly 99%ish win rate of those hands), and just letting the opponent fold when he doesn't have a push hand when he's first to act, so you can blind out the opponent with this strategy. (I assume he meant fold unless you have AA.) He all but said the perfect strategy would then be to make a small raise every hand you are first to act, and therefore you will either win, or end up folding to AA, KK, or AKs. Update: Bogdan mentions in his answer below that in the case of Sklansky's system, if the opponent moves all in on your raise, you should fold since you know he has AA, KK, or AKs. I'm guessing there is some software out there that has already calculated the answers? What is the best strategy against these all-in scenarios, and what is the expected win percentage when implementing the best strategy against these scenarios? Assume you are playing a NL Holdem tournament heads up where the starting stack is 200 times the big blind.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |